A couple years ago, I was interviewing for a job as digital design director at a (well-known) branding agency. After the usual pleasantries, we landed on the details of what the role would entail. To my dismay, the agency’s interpretation of « digital » was simply putting a new logo onto website mockups at the tail end of an extensive guidelines document. It was clear that digital was very much an afterthought in their branding process and that the position was not for me.
This lack of understanding about the role of digital was disappointing, but unfortunately it was not surprising. Most friends of mine working at branding agencies use the same top-down, siloed process. And let’s be clear, I have a lot of respect for their talent and the great design work they do. But, I believe that the old way of doing things—developing the strategy, then designing the brand and then the application—is in desperate need of a rethink. At a time when brand experiences are often based upon touch, sound, and voice, how can a branding process that starts out from a purely visual perspective ever possibly succeed?
Start-up, ubérisation du travail, commerces et services en ligne, objets connectés et imprimantes 3D, ce basculement de l’économie traditionnelle vers l’économie digitale génère de nouveaux langages de marque liés aux nouveaux comportements d’achats.
Les noms et les symboles des marques de la nouvelle économie collent à la nervosité et la rapidité de croissance développée par cette économie. Une entreprise issue de la nouvelle économie se déploie à l’échelle de la planète sans passer par la case traditionnelle du marché local, son terrain de jeu est dès le départ la planète. Le « digital native » ne consomme plus un produit matérialisé dans un lieu bien en dur, mais navigue dans un univers dématérialisé. Son acte d’achat passe par un like puis un clic, et si c’est un bon plan à partager, il le tweet ou envoie un messenger à sa communauté d’amis.
